AI-text detector, plagiarism checker, fact-checker and readability scorer sold to agencies, publishers and educators; scans are billed in credits, one credit per 100 words.
Scoring AI Detectors on the Accuracy Somebody Else Measured, Not the One They Advertise
1 tool measured · Trust Score data collected 3 August 2026
Every detector publishes an accuracy figure about itself. This category scores them on figures published by people with nothing to sell — academic papers that state their corpus, their sample size and their method, and can be opened and checked. Two numbers matter and vendors tend to quote only the first: how often a detector catches AI text, and how often it accuses a human. The second is the one that ends careers and academic appeals, so it is published beside the first here rather than behind it.
Outbound links may be affiliate links and can earn us a commission — they never touch a score or this order.
How they compare
The same tools side by side — every number dated, sourced and reproducible.
| # | Tool | Score /100 | Confidence | Flags | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI-text detector, plagiarism checker, fact-checker and readability scorer sold to agencies, publishers and educators; scans are billed in credits, one credit per 100 words. | 30.1 | low (coverage) | — | Pro $14.95/mo — $12.95 billed annually (2,000 credits) · Enterprise $179/mo — $136.58 annually (15,000 credits) · pay-as-you-go credit packs · NO free tier (originality.ai/pricing, 3 August 2026) |
Read the dimensions, not the rank
Before you buy, settle what happens when the tool is wrong about a person. Read the vendor's terms for who carries the liability when a detector's output is used in an academic, employment or disciplinary decision — some contracts put it on the buyer, not the company. And check what any published accuracy figure was measured on: a score from clean, unedited text says little about text somebody lightly rewrote, which is what a detector actually meets.
Where these numbers come from
Capability is sourced from public output-quality arenas (blind pairwise votes), usability from review-crowd aggregates weighted by sample size, value from verified pricing, and safety & trust from indemnification terms plus consumer-trust records. Reliability requires a controlled benchmark run and is marked unmeasured until we run one. Full detail: methodology.